Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

1 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of Mazandaran, Behshar, Iran

2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Iran

Abstract

Synchronous generators are one of the most important components of power systems. Problems a generator may face are internal faults, system disturbances, or operational hazards. The operation of a generator may easily be affected by faults within the machine itself as opposed to external disturbances occurring on the network to which it is connected. Generator protection must therefore be designed to react efficiently in both conditions. Loss of excitation (LOE) is a common fault in synchronous generators. The most common causes of LOE include the loss of field to the main exciter, accidental tripping of the field breaker, short circuits in the field circuit, and poor brush contact in the exciter. The most widely applied method to detect a generator loss of field condition on major generators is the use of distance relays to sense the variations of impedance as viewed from the generator terminals. This approach may not be able to distinguish between LOE and stable power swing (SPS). This paper further explores a new method proposed for LOE detection and corrects its shortcomings. It also presents a new approach for LOE detection that exploits a combined scheme based on the derivative of the terminal voltage and the derivative power angle of the generator. Comprehensive simulation studies are conducted on various generator conditions and system disturbances to determine the relay setting and to evaluate its performance. These studies demonstrate that the proposed strategy enhances the security and operation time of the LOE relay compared with some existing methods.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1] P. Kundur, A. Bose et al., “Definition and Classification
of Power System Stability”,IEEE Trans. On PS, Vol. 19,
No. 2, pp. 1387-1401, May, 2004.

[2] “Blackout of 2003: Description and Responses”, Dennis
Ray PSERC, Nov. 5th 2003.

[3] “Final Report on the August 14th Blackout in the United
States and Canada,” U.S.-Canada Power System Outage
Task Force.

[4] V. Venkatasubramanian, Y. Li, “Analysis of 1996
Western American Electric Blackouts”, Bulk Power
System Dynamics and Control-VI, August 24-27,
2004,Italy.

[5] O. Usta, M.H. Musa, M. Bayrak, M.A. Redfern, “A New
Relaying Algorithm to Detect Loss of Excitation of
Synchronous Generators”, Turk J Elec. Engin. Vol.
15,No. 3, pp. 339-349, 2007.

[6] R. Sandoval, A. Guzman, H.J. Altuve, “Dynamic
Simulations Help Improve Generator Protection”, SEL
2006.

[7] IEEE Committee Report, “IEEE Guide for AC
Generator Protection”, Trans. on PWRD, Vol. 4, No. 2,
pp.957-964, 1989.

[8] C.R.ST. Pierre, “Loss-of-Excitation Protection for
Synchronous Generators on Isolated Systems”, IEEE
Trans on IA, Vol. IA-21, NO.1, 1985.

[9] J. Berdy, “Loss of excitation protection for modern
synchronous generators”, IEEE Trans. on PAS, Vol. 94,
No.5, pp.1457-1463, 1975.

[10] W.F. Mackenzie, J.A. Imhof, C. Dewey, E.J. Emmerling,
F.H. Freer, S.H. Horowitz ,C.L. Wagner, “Loss-of-field
Relay Operation During System Disturbances Working
Group Report”, IEEE on PAS, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp.1464-
74, 1971.

[11] D.C. Lee, P. Kundur, R.D. Brown, “A high speed
discriminating generator loss of excitation protection”,
IEEE Trans. on PAS, Vol. 94, pp. 1865-1899, 1979.

[12] A.R. Charles, M. Rogers, “A study of loss of excitation
relaying and stability of a 595 MVA generator on the
Detroit Edison System”, IEEE Trans. on PAS, Vol. 94,
No. 5,pp. 1449-1456, 1975.

[13] H.G. Darron, J.L. Koepfinger, J.R. Mather, P.A. Rusch,
“The influence of generator loss of excitation on bulk
power system stability”, IEEE Trans. on PAS, Vol. 96,
No.5, pp. 1473-1483, 1975.

[14] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, Vol. I,
New York, McGraw-Hill Inc., 1993.

[15] A. P. d. Morais, G. Cardoso, and L. Mariotto, "An
Innovative Loss-of-Excitation Protection Based on the
Fuzzy Inference Mechanism," IEEE Transactions on
Power Delivery, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2197-2204, 2010.

[16] N. P. C. W. Series, P. Tatro, and J. Gardell, "Power Plant
and Transmission System Protection Coordination Phase
Distance (21) and Voltage-Controlled or Voltage-
Restrained Overcurrent Protection (51V)," 2010.

[17] R. Sandoval, A. Guzman, and H. J. Altuve, "Dynamic
simulations help improve generator protection," in 2007
Power Systems Conference: Advanced
Metering,Protection, Control, Communication, and
Distributed Resources, 2007, pp. 16-38.

[18] "SEL-300G Multifunction Generator Relay Instruction
Manual," ed. Pullman WA:Schweitzer Engineering
Laboratories, March 1998.

[19] B. Mahamedi, J. G. Zhu, and S. M. Hashemi, "A Setting-
Free Approach to Detecting Loss of Excitation in
Synchronous Generators," IEEE Transactions on Power
Delivery,vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 2270-2278, 2016.

[20] H. Yaghobi, "Fast discrimination of stable power swing
with synchronous generator loss of excitation," IET
Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 10, no. 7,
pp. 1682-1690, 2016.

[21] H. Yaghobi, "Impact of static synchronous compensator
on flux-based synchronous generator loss of excitation
protection," IET Generation, Transmission &
Distribution ,vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 874-883, 2015.

[22] H. Yaghobi and H. Mortazavi, "A novel method to
prevent incorrect operation of synchronous generator
loss of excitation relay during and after different external
faults, "International Transactions on Electrical Energy
Systems, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1717-1735,2015.

[23] A. Ghorbani, S. Soleymani, and B. Mozafari, "A PMU-
Based LOE Protection of Synchronous Generator in the
Presence of GIPFC," IEEE Transactions on Power
Delivery, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 551-558, 2016.

[24] Donalt. Reiment; Protective Relaying for Power
Generation Syatems; Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.

[25] Ramón Sandoval, Comisión Federal de Electricidad;
Dynamic Simulation Help Improve Generator
Protection; Armando Guzmán and Héctor J. Altuve,
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc; 2006.

[26] Gabriel Benmouyal, The Impact of Synchronous
Generators Excitation Supply on Protection and Relays,
Scheweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.

[27] P.J. Moore, A. Stangenberg , “An investigation into the
impedance characteristics o f a synchronous generator
under loss of excitation condition ”,International
Conference on Energy Management and Power Delivery
Vo. 2, 3-5 March 1998 pp.619 - 624.

[28] R.D. Rana, R.P. Schulz, M j. Heyeck, and T.R. Jr Boyer,
“Generator loss of field study for AEP's Rockport plant”
IEEE on Computer Applications in Power, Vol. 3, Issue
2, April 1990 pp.44 - 49.

[29] K.Z. Guo , W.D. Zhu, F.W.Tan , R.L. Jih , and G.Wang ,
“Analysis of large turbogenerator's asynchronous
operation during loss of field”, IEEE International
Conference on Power System Technology, Vol. 2, 18-21
Aug.1998, p p .9 3 5 940.

[30]
S. R. Tambay and Y. G. Paithankar, “A new adaptive
loss of excitation relay augmented by the
rate of change
of reactance," in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Gen.

Meeting, Jun. 2005, vol. 2, pp. 1831
1835.

[31]
Behnam Mahamedi, Jian Guo Zhu, and Sayyed
Mohammad Hashemi, “A setting
-free approach to
detecting loss of excitation in synchronous generators,”

IE
EE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 31, no. 5, pp.
2270
-2278, 2016.

[32] IEEE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR
EXCITATION SYSTEM; IEEE Std 421.5_1992.

[33]
Hamid Yaghobi, and Hashem Mortazavi, “A novel
method to prevent incorrect operation of synchronous

generator loss
of excitation relay during and after
different external faults,” European Transactions on

Electrical Power, Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 1717
-1735, 2014.

[34]
Milad NiazAzari, "A setting-free flux-based
synchronous generator loss of excitation protection."

Electrical En
gineering 100.4 (2018): 2329-2339.

[35]
T. Amraee, “Loss-of-field detection in synchronous
generators using decision tree technique,” IET Gener.

Transm. Distrib., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 943
954, 2013.

[36]
M. Amini, M. Davarpanah, and M. Sanaye-Pasand, “A
novel approach
to detect the synchronous generator loss
of excitation,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 30, no. 3,

pp. 1429
1438, Jun. 2015.

[37]
Sirus Salehimehr; Behrooz Taheri; Seyed Amir
Hosseini; Hossein Askarian Abyaneh; Farzad Razavi.

"A New Power Swing Detection Method
Based on
Hilbert Transform"
,International Journal of Industrial
Elecronics, Control
and Optimization, 3, 2, 2020,
pp.103
-114.